<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paquin's Poorly Maintained Blog &#187; camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/tag/camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New camera order placed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera-order-placed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera-order-placed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SX1IS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/?p=589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I broke down and placed the order for the Canon SX1IS from Newegg. I originally placed it with Amazon, but it was going to take them 4 weeks (!) to ship it, so I opted to pay $10 in shipping to get it sooner. I also purchased some after-market additions from Lensmate; specifically a 58mm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I broke down and placed the order for the Canon SX1IS from Newegg. I originally placed it with Amazon, but it was going to take them 4 weeks (!) to ship it, so I opted to pay $10 in shipping to get it sooner. I also purchased some after-market additions from <a title="Lensmate" href="http://www.lensmateonline.com/">Lensmate</a>; specifically<a href="http://lensmateonline.com/newsite/SX10SX1.html"> a 58mm filter adapter and a better lens cap</a>. I&#8217;ll be experimenting with a polarized lens for some outdoor shots. I&#8217;m really looking forward to using it on our upcoming vacations &#8211; and the size of it looks very manageable for Mary Lou too.</p>
<p>I also snagged a couple of Digital Photography books from Amazon (those did ship in a reasonable time), and am hoping to get a few tips to squeeze some extra performance.</p>
<p>So&#8230; hopefully we&#8217;ll be posting some cool shots soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera-order-placed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A good review of the Canon SX1IS, and a quick update on Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/a-good-review-of-the-canon-sx1is-and-a-quick-update-on-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/a-good-review-of-the-canon-sx1is-and-a-quick-update-on-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SX1IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra zoom cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dpreview.com Canon SX1IS review Digital Photography Reviews (dpreview.com &#8211; a very good site) posted a review of the Canon SX1IS. While they didn&#8217;t pan it, some of the issues they spotted have certainly given me pause in my intent to purchase one from Amazon as soon as it&#8217;s released. I&#8217;m not a big fan of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>dpreview.com Canon SX1IS review</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonsx1is/">Digital Photography Reviews (dpreview.com &#8211; a very good site) posted a review of the Canon SX1IS</a>. While they didn&#8217;t pan it, some of the issues they spotted have certainly given me pause in my intent to purchase one from Amazon as soon as it&#8217;s released. I&#8217;m not a big fan of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Coolpix-P90-Vibration-Reduction/product-reviews/B001PKEJZQ/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&amp;showViewpoints=1">Nikon offering in this space (the P90)</a>. The <a href="http://blog.toptenreviews.com/?p=1999">Pentax Optio X70</a> looks promising, but there&#8217;s very little published on it yet, and while it&#8217;s sure to be less expensive ($400 instead of $600), I&#8217;m not sure the lack of full HD video and no swivel on the LCD display makes it a better choice. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-SP-590UZ-Digital-Optical-Stabilized/dp/B001P06Q66">Olympus SP-590UZ</a>, the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001OC7IXU">Kodak Z980</a>, and the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08072104panasonicfz28.asp">Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28K</a> look about the same as the Pentax (while differing in some areas, like optical zoom, etc.), and I think I&#8217;d choose the Pentax over those, all things being equal.</p>
<p>The only camera that has really stuck out to me in my research is the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH20-3-Inch-Digital/dp/B001HCTKZQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=photo&amp;qid=1238247535&amp;sr=1-1">Casio Exilim EX-FH20</a>. The 40 fps option look pretty intriguing. The 1000 fps &#8220;movie&#8221; mode looks gimicky. It doesn&#8217;t have the flip-out and rotatable LCD, and HD-mode is limited to 720p, but the very forgiving &#8220;capture images before you even press the button&#8221; feature does look pretty cool.</p>
<p>All-told, I still think I&#8217;m going to get the Canon, but am mulling our other options, too.</p>
<h4>Windows 7 update</h4>
<p>Windows 7 Build 7068 is available as a torrent &#8211; both 32bit and 64bit versions are available. I&#8217;m downloading them both as I type. It doesn&#8217;t look like any radically new stuff has been added, but we&#8217;ll see. I&#8217;m hopeful that they&#8217;ve fixed some driver issues and added some tweaks for the taskbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/a-good-review-of-the-canon-sx1is-and-a-quick-update-on-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Camera?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon SX1IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve had a Sony DSC-R1 for a few years now, and while it&#8217;s fine for my purposes, it&#8217;s much too large and complex to act as a convenient point-and-shoot for my wife. It&#8217;s also not a DSLR, so we&#8217;re stuck with the built-in lens. There are after-market options, but adding a special &#38; expensive lens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX1IS-Stabilized-2-8-inch/dp/B001SER44W"><img class="alignright" title="Canon SX1IS" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/photo/canon/canon.sx1s.lcd.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="180" /></a>We&#8217;ve had a <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscr1/">Sony DSC-R1</a> for a few years now, and while it&#8217;s fine for my purposes, it&#8217;s much too large and complex to act as a convenient point-and-shoot for my wife. It&#8217;s also not a DSLR, so we&#8217;re stuck with the built-in lens. There are after-market options, but adding a special &amp; expensive lens to a non-SLR just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me &#8211; and, plus, I&#8217;ve pretty much sworn off Sony for my consumer electronics. So, I&#8217;ve been in the market for two cameras for awhile: a DSLR for me, and a nice, accessible, point and shoot Digital Camera for Mary Lou. My primary reason for wanting a DSLR is to add a telephoto lens.</p>
<p>Several times in the past couple of years, I&#8217;ve come close to buying one or the other, but not both. I&#8217;ve toyed with the idea of buying a Canon, a Nikon, or maybe even an Olympus, but price (especially if you mix a zoom lens in), complexity, and the fact that nothing really has <strong>everything</strong> I&#8217;m looking for has stopped me from pulling the trigger. Features I&#8217;m looking for in particular include:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Very good zoom capability</strong> &#8211; I want to be able to shoot wild-life that we occasionally run across, such as deer, birds, foxes, etc.</li>
<li><strong>Rotatable Live View</strong> &#8211; shooting kids through a viewfinder just stinks, and catching an &#8220;over the head&#8221; or &#8220;around the corner&#8221; shot is difficult without Live View.</li>
<li><strong>Image Stabilization</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll never buy another camera without this. Too many shots have been ruined by my inability to be incredibly still.</li>
<li><strong>Good sensor size</strong> &#8211; I know that you don&#8217;t need a huge number of megapixels to shoot a good picture, but having the ability to crop in Photoshop later on without losing any usable (printable) pixels is a big plus. I&#8217;m not a pro photographer, so being able to snag a couple of faces in a group shot and make them look like hi-res portraits in their own right is nice.</li>
<li><strong>RAW format</strong> &#8211; again, being a non-pro, I&#8217;ve messed up quite a few shots that were over- or under-exposed, and without RAW format to fall back on, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d have been able to salvage anything.</li>
</ul>
<p>In any case, I think I&#8217;ve made up my mind to buy an upcoming Canon that has a decent set of features, and that may suffice for both of us: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX1IS-Stabilized-2-8-inch/dp/B001SER44W">the Canon SX1IS</a>. I&#8217;m intrigued by this model&#8217;s high-quality CMOS sensor, its inclusion of pretty much all the features I&#8217;m looking for, and some bonus features tossed in (30fps 1080p video, face detection, wireless remote control, auto Red Eye removal, i-Contrast, etc.). It looks like it&#8217;s still going to be pretty bulky ( close to 2 pounds with batteries) compared to some pocket cameras, but I suspect that that won&#8217;t be a problem due to our shooting habits. I&#8217;m not sure whether I&#8217;ll start off with &#8216;normal&#8217; AA batteries, or pick up the NIMH + charger. I&#8217;ll also be going with a <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820208410&amp;nm_mc=OTC-Froogle&amp;cm_mmc=OTC-Froogle-_-Memory+(Flash+Memory)-_-Transcend-_-20208410">&#8216;normal&#8217; Class 6 16GB SDHC Memory Card</a> (hrm &#8211; maybe 2x8GB would be better for backup).</p>
<p>As far as I can tell, the only thing this set up doesn&#8217;t have is the ability to add lenses (but with 20x zoom, I might not need it), and Bluetooth connectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrispaquin.com/ppmb/2009/new-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
